Receipts.law

29 C.F.R. § 825.112Qualifying reasons for leave, general rule

What this section is. § 825.112 is part of the Family and Medical Leave Act regulations (29 C.F.R. Part 825) and governs Qualifying reasons for leave, general rule. 8 court opinions applying it are listed below, each verified against the opinion's own text and linked to the full decision.
The rule begins: “(a) Circumstances qualifying for leave.”

The regulation, in full

(a) Circumstances qualifying for leave. Employers covered by FMLA are required to grant leave to eligible employees: (1) For birth of a son or daughter, and to care for the newborn child ( see § 825.120); (2) For placement with the employee of a son or daughter for adoption or foster care ( see § 825.121); (3) To care for the employee's spouse, son, daughter, or parent with a serious health condition ( see §§ 825.113 and 825.122); (4) Because of a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the functions of the employee's job ( see §§ 825.113 and 825.123); (5) Because of any qualifying exigency arising out of the fact that the employee's spouse, son, daughter, or parent is a military member on covered active duty (or has been notified of an impending call or order to covered active duty status ( see §§ 825.122 and 825.126); and (6) To care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness if the employee is the spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin of the covered servicemember. See §§ 825.122 and 825.127.

(b) Equal application. The right to take leave under FMLA applies equally to male and female employees. A father, as well as a mother, can take family leave for the birth, placement for adoption, or foster care of a child.

(c) Active employee. In situations where the employer/employee relationship has been interrupted, such as an employee who has been on layoff, the employee must be recalled or otherwise be re-employed before being eligible for FMLA leave. Under such circumstances, an eligible employee is immediately entitled to further FMLA leave for a qualifying reason.

Verbatim from the eCFR, title 29, section 825.112, current as of 2026-07-29. Read it at the official source: ecfr.gov →

Court opinions applying § 825.112

Each opinion below was checked against its own text: the citation appears in a C.F.R. context and the opinion discusses the FMLA. Cases that merely contained the number were dropped.

CaseCourtDecided
Thomas v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia2016-07-18
Kathryn Pereda v. Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2012-01-10
Steve Aubuchon v. Knauf Fiberglass, GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit2004-03-08
Aubuchon, Steve v. Knauf FiberglassCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit2004-03-08
Rush v. E.I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio2012-11-20
Johnston Sch. Com. v. Johnston Fed., Tea.Superior Court of Rhode Island2011-11-04
Bernardo G. Bocalbos, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. National Western Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit1999-03-16
Bocalbos v. Natl We Life Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit1998-12-29

Opinions hosted by CourtListener, a free public service of the non-profit Free Law Project. Court opinions are public-domain works of the United States.

General legal information, not legal advice. This page reproduces a federal regulation and lists decisions that cite it. It does not tell you how any rule applies to your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Regulations change and courts read them differently across circuits — confirm the current text at ecfr.gov and talk to a licensed attorney in your state.